Digital Hate Speech Surrounding the Renaissance Dam Crisis: A Content Analysis of Posts on the “Ethiopia in Arabic” Facebook Page
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67732/tkw.v1.i1.10Keywords:
Facebook, digital hate speech, Renaissance Dam crisis, Ethiopia in Arabic, online hostility, social media discourseAbstract
This study examines the patterns and manifestations of digital hate speech surrounding the Renaissance Dam crisis on Facebook. It employed a quantitative content analysis methodology using a census approach to analyse all 332 posts published on the “Ethiopia in Arabic” (Ethiopia Bil-Arabi) Facebook page over a four-month period. The findings indicate that hate speech, incitement, and other forms of hostile digital discourse constituted a substantial proportion of the content analysed, with posts containing hate speech-related expressions accounting for 68.98% of the total posts. The analysis also identified several recurring discursive practices, including incitement to hostility and discord, disinformation, mockery and ridicule, disparagement of opposing groups, and racist rhetoric. Furthermore, the findings suggest that such forms of discourse contributed to an antagonistic communicative environment among users expressing opposing positions on the Renaissance Dam issue. The study also raises concerns regarding the extent to which platform policies addressing hate speech, incitement, and disinformation are reflected in the content circulating on pages engaged in contentious political and regional issues. Overall, the findings highlight the role of Facebook-based communication in facilitating the circulation of hostile and divisive discourse surrounding the Renaissance Dam crisis and underscore the need for greater attention to the moderation, regulation, and responsible management of contentious digital content.
References
Al Adwan, M. N., Basha, S. E., Hegazy, A., Ahmed, A. M., & Fayez, H. (2026). Audience exposure to digital media coverage of the civil war in Sudan and its relationship with psychological immunity and post-traumatic stress disorder. Journalism and Media, 7(2), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020106
Al-Ababneh, H. A., Alrhaimi, S. A., Fayez, H., Ababneh, J., Alkhaldy, I., Mohammad, S. I., & Vasudevan, A. (2026). Using analytics and big data to improve marketing strategies in e-commerce. In AI-driven healthcare: Automation and robotics (pp. 1411–1424). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15739-3_104
Abu alasal, N., Hmouz, Y., & Al-Nadi, A. (2026). Employing Facebook as a Strategic Public Relations Tool in Digital Reputation Management: A Study of Palestinian Telecommunications Companies. Journal of Intelligent Digital Media and Communication, 1(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.67732/jidmc.v1i1.6
Al-Makhzoomy, A. K., Alnasser, T. Z., Taleb, A. M. A., & Fayez, H. (2026). University stu-dents' following libraries' YouTube channels and their attitudes towards the library and read-ing. Studies in Media and Communication, 14(2), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v14i2.8008
Anti-Defamation League. (2013). Report and recommendations of the task force on Internet hate of the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism (ICCA). https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/press-center/ICCA-Report.pdf
_Bengtson, V. L., Harris, S., & Putney, N. M. (2017). Families and faith: How religion is passed down across generations. Oxford University Press.
Center for Countering Digital Hate. (n.d.). Center for Countering Digital Hate. https://www.counterhate.com/
Cyberhate.ca. (n.d.). Canada's Cyberhate Research Centre. https://www.cyberhate.ca/
||-Edelstein, Y., & Wolf, C. (2013). Report and recommendations of the task force on inter-net hate of the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism (ICCA). Anti-Defamation League. https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/press-center/ICCA-Report.pdf
ElSherief, M., Nilizadeh, S., Nguyen, D., Vigna, G., & Belding, E. (2018). Peer to peer hate: Hate speech instigators and their targets. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12(1), 52–61.
Facebook. (2017، June 27). Hard questions: Hate speech. https://about.fb.com/news/2017/06/hard-questions-hate-speech/
Facebook. (n.d.). Community Standards: Hate Speech. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/hate_speec
Fayez, H., Al Adwan, M. N., Hegazy, A., & El Hajji, M. (2026). The impact of artificial intel-ligence techniques on developing media content production skills: A comparative quasi-experimental study on students in France, Egypt, and the UAE. Journalism and Media, 7(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7010043
Hughey, M. W., & Daniels, J. (2013). Racist comments at online news sites: A methodolog-ical dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 35(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712472089
King, R. D., & Sutton, G. M. (2013). High times for hate crimes: Explaining the temporal clustering of hate-motivated offending. Criminology, 51(4), 871–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12022
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (n.d.). Special Rappor-teur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intoler-ance. https://www.ohchr.org/AR/Issues/Racism/SRRacism/Pages/Mandate.aspx
Isbeetan, T., & Adway, A. (2026). Digital Privacy and Security in Wartime: Examining So-cietal Trends and the Impact of Social Media Platform Policies during the 2023 Gaza War. Journal of Intelligent Digital Media and Communication, 1(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.67732/jidmc.v1i1.8
Quandt, T., & Festl, R. (2017). Cyberhate. In P. Rössler (Ed.), The International encyclope-dia of media effects (pp. 1–8). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0173
Silva, L., Mondal, M., Correa, D., Benevenuto, F., & Weber, I. (2016). Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 10(1), 687–690.
SpringerOpen. (2016). The hateful content of Facebook pages. EPJ Data Science. https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0087
Udupa, S., Maronikolakis, A., & Wisiorek, A. (2023). Ethical scaling for content moderation: Extreme speech and the (in)significance of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231172424
الأمم المتحدة. (2019، أكتوبر). المقرر الخاص المعني بحرية الرأي والتعبير: ديفيد كاي. أخبار الأمم المتحدة https://news.un.org/ar/story/2019/10/1042131
الأمم المتحدة. (2019، مايو). خطة عمل الأمم المتحدة بشأن خطاب الكراهية. أخبار الأمم المتحدة https://news.un.org/ar/story/2019/06/1035301
الأهرام للدراسات السياسية والاستراتيجية. (2021). الأزمة الداخلية في إثيوبيا: الأسباب والسيناريوهات https://acpss.ahram.org.eg/News/17002.aspx
جمال، ابتهال. (2021، سبتمبر). سد النهضة: صراع مستدام أم تنمية مستدامة. ورقة عمل مقدمة إلى ورشة عمل سد النهضة: الفرص والتحديات، جامعة الزعيم الأزهري، السودان
الخصاونة، صخر أحمد، & العتوم، سهل علي. (2021). دور وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي في نشر خطاب الكراهية من وجهة نظر الصحفيين الأردنيين: دراسة ميدانية. مجلة الجامعة الإسلامية للبحوث الإنسانية، 29(1)، 300–322
سحاري، مصطفى، & نبيح، أمنية. (2017). مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي وصناعة خطاب الكراهية في الجزائر: دراسة وصفية لعدة نماذج عبر صفحات الفيسبوك. في وقائع المؤتمر الدولي: الإعلام بين خطاب الكراهية والأمن الفكري (ص ص. 553–569). كلية الصحافة والإعلام، جامعة الزرقاء
السنوسي، ثريا. (2017). سيمائية الصورة في خطاب الكراهية. في وقائع المؤتمر الدولي: الإعلام بين خطاب الكراهية والأمن الفكري (ص ص. 639–657). كلية الصحافة والإعلام، جامعة الزرقاء
مرصد الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا. (2015). مشروع رصد خطابات الحقد والكراهية بالصحافة المكتوبة الأردنية والجزائرية والمغربية والليبية. https://mena-monitor.org
مصطفى، معتصم بابكر. (2014). أيديولوجيا شبكات التواصل الاجتماعي وتشكيل الرأي العام. مركز التنوير
معتوق، ازدهار. (2017). مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي وصناعة الرأي العام. مجلة الوحدة الإسلامية، (181 https://bit.ly/3b5LbFc
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hisham Abd Elmoez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Authors retain copyright of their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. This license allows anyone to copy, distribute, transmit, adapt, and build upon the work, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
The full terms of the license are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
